Our schools consist of two major types of schools- public and private. While a very small percentage are home schooled, the majority fit into the two main divisions. Our schools are a combination of economic status, as well as racial and ethnic background. These factors, over the years, have become deeply influential in the success of the school. Although the schools receive funding from different branches of the government, the largest amount of funding comes from the local and state institutions. In short, the higher the property taxes are, the more funding will be received. The government has prescribed the curriculum guidelines that determine whether you have completed the standard educational level.
The students are a direct correlation to the diversity present in our country. While most public schools are generally white, that is not true across the board for specific districts toward urban areas. In more urban areas, the statistics seem to be reversed. For example, in Chicago, Houston and Los Angeles its 91% students of color. On the the other hand, 57% are generally white. While this may or may not affect the educational goals, it is pertinent in the overall evaluation of our schools because it directly relates to income.
Unlike our incredible diversity of our student body, our teachers force is homogeneous. Teachers in our country are a whopping 90% white, and dividing that further into 79% female. This directly effects the influence on our student and the presentation of cultural diversity in education. Nonetheless, in schools with higher poverty levels, there is a 20% turnover rate, which altogether are the main reasons for teacher shortages. Thirty-three percent of these teachers will leave within their first three years of teaching. In turn, in the higher poverty schools the teachers are newer and inexperienced. To repair this issue, salaries have become a persuasive form of gearing teachers toward these schools.

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I found a whole bunch of the statistics, in this reading, eye openning. It's pretty crazy how uneven the playing field is in our future profession. It is dominated by white people and even more so females.
The statistics are very interesting. The fact that there are mostly all white female teachers caught my attention. Why do you think that is? Is it becaust that women are better teachers? Or is it that there aren't as many men interested in teaching. Not only did the gender issue pop out, but the fact that most teachers are white.
fitforlife...One reason the teaching field is dominated by young females might be because it is a very diserable career to have while rasing children or having a family. Also, for a lot of females teaching & nurturing come very naturally. Still, I find it disheartening that there are so few male teachers out there. I believe many young men need good role models in their lives & a male teacher could play this important role.
There appears to be a lot of diversity among your schools. What are the ages of your students though? What determines when someone has completed school? From what age do children begin and end school?
Dear Bien –Aime,
The information which you have provided about the United States public school system is very informative. However, I do not understand some aspects. For instance, you mentioned that schools are based on economic status. Does this mean that people of low status have a slimmer chance in attending a more economically stable school? In accordance, are the students of low income environments allowed to break free from the cycle and attend a school which is of a higher economic status, or are they bound to that particular system?
The way in which you described your schools to be a mirror of the diversity seen throughout the United States is very exemplary. As far as the curriculum, being that the schools are so diverse, do you address these differences within the classroom? There was also mention of the concentrated amounts of students in places like Chicago and Los Angeles and how many of these particular areas are related on income. So the basic idea in the public school system is that children are segregated based on their income? This seems to be unjust in my opinion, because children should not be classified in such ways to that they are being deprived of what other higher income students may receive, or learn.
When you stated that 33% of teachers will leave, why is that? Are the expectations too high? You mentioned in the previous blog before about the No Child Left Behind, is this affecting a teacher’s role? Additionally, being that the population of teachers is generally homogenous, what is the United States doing to attract different people into this rewarding, yet challenging career?
I have learned a great deal about the United States school system through this blog. Thank you Bien-Aime for taking the time to inform me.
Post a Comment